About Us | Contact Us | FAQ
Text Size
CLUBHOUSERESOURCESSUBSCRIBE

The Skinny on Popular Diets

Why bestselling diet plans don't necessarily work any better than do-it-yourself programs.

by Harvard Heart Letter | May 2006

KEYWORDS: Health, Diet


3.Health.Diets
“ What you really need is a plan you can stick with for many, many moons. ”

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | Next

If losing weight was one of your New Year's resolutions and you quit by February, don't despair. Many off-the-shelf diets come with the seeds of failure -- restriction, deprivation, hunger and cravings -- already planted.

Finding an effective eating strategy is serious business if you are considerably overweight and are interested in improving your long-term health. Halting any further weight gain and gradually shedding pounds can have beneficial effects on blood pressure, cholesterol, diabetes, your risk of having a heart attack or stroke, joint pain and the energy and ability to do everyday activities.

What you really need is a plan you can stick with for many, many moons. It should be as good for your heart, bones, colon and psyche as it is for your waistline. It should offer plenty of tasty and healthy choices, banish few foods, and not require an extensive and expensive list of groceries or supplements.

Let's use this yardstick as a way to measure some of the popular diet books.

Low Carbs

In the early 2000s, the most popular diets were those preaching the carbs-are-bad gospel. Once seen as the go-to foods for weight loss, carbohydrates such as bread, pasta and rice were reviled as dietary demons, thanks to the Atkins, SouthBeach and other low-carb diets. Avoiding carbohydrates, so the thinking goes, forces the body to burn fat.

Does this theory translate into actual weight loss? Yes and no -- it depends on the individual and the time period. Some people lose a substantial amount of weight on a low-carb diet, while others lose little and some actually gain weight. And for those who lose, the effects typically aren't permanent. After a few months, weight loss tends to slow and reverse, just as happens with most other diet types.

Bottom line: Low-carb diets work for some people and not others. There's no evidence that their short-term effects produce long-term weight loss, while the added expense could lighten your wallet. Equally important, we know little about the long-term health effects of high-protein, high-fat, low-carb diets.

Low Fat

Once the main strategy for losing weight, low-fat diets have been elbowed aside by the low-carb frenzy. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since neither of the two foundations on which low-fat diets were built -- fat makes you fat, and fat is bad for the heart -- are very solid. Healthy fats can actually promote weight loss, while some fats are good for the heart and eliminating them from the diet can cause problems.

Scores of low-fat diets have been promoted over the years. One of the best known is Dr. Dean Ornish's Eat More, Weigh Less plan. Since fat contains 9 calories per gram while carbohydrates contain 4, you can theoretically double your food intake without taking in more calories by cutting back on fatty foods and eating more that are full of carbohydrates, especially water-rich fruits and vegetables.

Keep in mind that the Ornish plan doesn't stop at a whole-grain, vegetarian, very-low-fat (less than 10% of calories from fat) diet, but also includes exercise, stress management and group support.

Bottom line: Low-fat diets have unquestionably helped some people lose weight and keep it off. They've been dismal failures for others, in part because they tend to be less filling, less flavorful, and all around less satisfying than other eating strategies. They also tend to be fairly restrictive about food choices, which can limit your options when dining out.

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | Next


Print this page     Send to a friend

Live Bigger with What's Next! Get the best of the web on work, health, money, travel, and more.